The Indispensable Role of Metacognition in Strategic Systems Thinking for Complex Problem Solving

I. Introduction: Navigating Complexity Through Mindful Systems

The contemporary landscape across diverse domains—including public policy, organizational management, technological design, healthcare delivery, educational reform, and environmental sustainability—is increasingly characterized by challenges of profound complexity.1 These challenges are often described as "wicked problems," a term denoting issues that are difficult or impossible to solve definitively due to their incomplete, contradictory, and evolving requirements, which are themselves often hard to recognize.11 Such problems resist straightforward solutions because they involve numerous interdependent factors, dynamic interactions, non-linear relationships, and multiple stakeholder perspectives with potentially conflicting values.11 Problems like climate change, poverty, healthcare access, and large-scale organizational transformation exemplify this wickedness; they cannot be effectively addressed by fixing isolated components, as the intricate web of connections means even minor interventions can have unforeseen and significant consequences.11

Traditional problem-solving approaches, often rooted in linear, reductionist thinking, frequently prove inadequate when confronting such complexity.23 Linear thinking attempts to break problems down into discrete parts, assuming clear cause-and-effect relationships and seeking singular, optimal solutions.23 However, this approach often leads to interventions that only address surface symptoms, generate unintended negative side effects elsewhere in the system, or fail entirely because they overlook the underlying structures and feedback dynamics that govern the system's behavior.11 The tendency to seek simple, clear, and often wrong solutions for complex problems persists, hindering effective action.27

In response to the limitations of conventional methods, two distinct but complementary capabilities emerge as crucial: Strategic Systems Thinking (SST) and Metacognition. Strategic Systems Thinking offers a holistic framework for understanding and intervening in complex systems. It emphasizes grasping the interconnectedness of parts, identifying feedback loops, recognizing emergent patterns, considering system boundaries and multiple perspectives, and focusing on achieving long-term strategic goals.1 Metacognition, often described as "thinking about thinking," refers to the awareness, monitoring, and regulation of one's own cognitive processes.20 This includes understanding one's cognitive strengths and weaknesses, recognizing biases, assessing task demands, selecting appropriate strategies, monitoring comprehension and progress, and adapting one's approach as needed.

This report argues that the relationship between metacognition and strategic systems thinking is not merely additive or beneficial; rather, metacognition is fundamentally necessary for the effective perception, adoption, and application of strategic systems thinking when addressing the complex, dynamic, and uncertain problems that define our times. It is the capacity for self-aware, self-regulated thought that enables the crucial shift from inadequate linear perspectives to the required systemic understanding and action. The very act of identifying a problem as "complex" or "wicked," thereby signaling the need for a systems approach, is itself dependent on metacognitive processes. Without the ability to reflect on the shortcomings of simple cause-and-effect reasoning (a facet of metacognitive knowledge) and to monitor the adequacy of one's own understanding against the nuances of the situation (metacognitive monitoring), an individual might fail to even perceive the systemic nature of the challenge they face.11 Recognizing the defining characteristics of wicked problems—their interconnectedness, resistance to resolution, lack of definitive formulation—requires stepping back from a default linear viewpoint.11 Metacognition provides precisely this capacity to step back, assess the nature of the problem itself, and evaluate the suitability of one's own thinking patterns in relation to it.20 Therefore, the initial judgment that a situation warrants systems thinking is predicated on metacognitive activity.

Furthermore, the increasing interconnectedness, dynamism, and information density of the modern world 23 create an environment that inherently demands both systems thinking and heightened metacognitive capabilities. The complexity is not merely an external feature of the systems we engage with; it also manifests internally as increased cognitive load, heightened potential for information overload, and a greater reliance on potentially flawed mental shortcuts or cognitive biases when attempting to make sense of it all.55 The external system complexity—characterized by obscured linear causality and dominant feedback loops 1—drives the need for systems thinking methodologies. Concurrently, the internal cognitive complexity generated by trying to grasp these systems necessitates robust metacognitive skills—to monitor comprehension, detect biases, evaluate the effectiveness of chosen strategies, and regulate cognitive resources effectively.20 Thus, the challenge of complexity operates on two fronts, demanding a synergistic response that integrates both systemic analysis of the external world and metacognitive management of the internal world of the thinker.

II. Defining Strategic Systems Thinking: A Framework for Complexity

To understand the necessity of metacognition, it is first essential to clearly define Strategic Systems Thinking (SST). SST is not a single technique but a holistic approach that integrates the core principles of systems thinking with a clear strategic orientation aimed at achieving long-term goals within complex environments. It moves beyond merely describing system behavior to actively seeking ways to influence that behavior towards desired future states.

A. Foundations in Systems Thinking

SST is built upon the foundational principles of systems thinking, which provide a language and framework for understanding complexity.23 Key principles include:

• Holism: Systems thinking mandates viewing systems as integrated wholes, recognizing that the properties and behaviors of the whole emerge from the interactions of its parts and cannot be understood by analyzing the parts in isolation.1 The whole is considered primary, the parts secondary.29 This contrasts sharply with reductionist approaches that break systems down.23

• Interconnectedness: A core tenet is that system components are dynamically interconnected and interdependent.1 Actions or changes in one part of the system can propagate through these connections, influencing other parts and the system as a whole, often in non-obvious ways.19 The DSRP (Distinctions, Systems, Relationships, Perspectives) model highlights 'Relationships' as a fundamental cognitive pattern in structuring information systemically.20

• Feedback Loops: Systems thinking emphasizes circular causality over linear cause-and-effect.23 Feedback loops, where the output of one element influences its own future input via a chain of connections, are seen as the primary drivers of system behavior over time.1 These loops can be reinforcing (positive), amplifying change and leading to exponential growth or collapse, or balancing (negative), counteracting change and seeking equilibrium or stability.1 Mapping these loops helps diagnose system dynamics.1

• Emergence: System behavior and novel properties emerge from the dynamic interactions of its components.1 These emergent properties, such as the culture of an organization or the traffic patterns in a city, cannot be fully understood or predicted by examining the individual parts alone.1

• Boundaries: While real-world systems are interconnected, defining system boundaries is necessary for analysis.1 Boundaries delineate the scope of the system under consideration, separating it from its environment, though these boundaries are often permeable.65 The choice of boundary is critical and depends on the purpose of the analysis; poorly chosen boundaries can lead to overlooking crucial influences or unintended consequences.21 The DSRP model's 'Distinctions' element relates to this cognitive act of defining identity and boundary.20

• Perspectives: A comprehensive understanding of a system requires acknowledging and integrating multiple perspectives.1 Different stakeholders (individuals, groups, organizations) will have different viewpoints, mental models, values, and experiences related to the system.1 Incorporating these diverse views is essential for accurate diagnosis and effective intervention. DSRP's 'Perspectives' element underscores this fundamental aspect of systemic cognition.20

• Stocks and Flows: System structure is often conceptualized using stocks (accumulations, reservoirs of material or information that change over time) and flows (the rates at which stocks increase or decrease).1 Stocks provide system memory and inertia, creating delays and stability.21

B. Integrating Strategic Intent

Strategic Systems Thinking builds upon these foundational principles by explicitly incorporating strategic purpose and a focus on long-term goal achievement.29 It is not merely about understanding how a system operates, but about understanding how to intervene effectively to guide the system towards a desired future state. Key strategic elements include:

• Action Orientation and Leverage Points: SST moves beyond passive analysis to identify strategic points of intervention, known as leverage points.1 These are places within a system's structure (e.g., feedback loops, information flows, rules, goals, paradigms) where small, well-focused actions can produce significant, lasting changes throughout the system.21

• Future Orientation and Adaptability: SST is inherently future-oriented, concerned with achieving long-term goals and building resilience.9 It involves anticipating trends, designing strategies that can adapt to changing conditions and uncertainty, and considering the sustainability of outcomes.12 Strategic design, a related concept, aims to solve current problems while ensuring future relevance.80

• Alignment with Purpose and Goals: Interventions are guided by and aligned with the overarching purpose or strategic objectives of the organization or system being addressed.78 This ensures that actions are coherent and contribute meaningfully to the desired direction.

• Managing Trade-offs and Risks: Recognizing that interventions in complex systems rarely produce only positive effects, SST involves consciously evaluating potential trade-offs between competing objectives and managing the risks of unintended consequences.31 It requires balancing priorities based on the strategic context.66

This integration of strategic intent actively shapes how systems thinking principles are applied. The choice of system boundaries 1, the selection of relevant perspectives 1, and the prioritization of feedback loops for analysis 1 are not neutral analytical decisions. Instead, they are guided by the specific long-term goals being pursued. One defines the system and identifies critical relationships based on their relevance to achieving the strategic objective. This implies a necessary shift from purely descriptive systems analysis (understanding how the system functions) towards a more prescriptive or normative stance (understanding how to influence the system to function better relative to a defined goal). This inherently involves navigating value judgments and negotiating among stakeholders with potentially differing views on what constitutes a "better" outcome.5

C. Synthesized Definition of Strategic Systems Thinking

Based on the integration of these systemic principles and strategic elements, Strategic Systems Thinking can be defined as:

A holistic and iterative approach to understanding and influencing complex, dynamic systems by analyzing their interconnectedness, feedback structures, emergent behaviors, boundaries, and multiple perspectives, with the explicit intent of identifying high-leverage interventions to achieve desired, sustainable long-term goals while anticipating and managing trade-offs and unintended consequences.

This definition encapsulates both the analytical depth derived from systems thinking and the purposeful, future-oriented action inherent in strategic management. It highlights the need to look at the big picture, understand underlying dynamics, and act thoughtfully to shape the future in complex environments.29

III. Metacognitive Knowledge: Recognizing the Limits of Simplicity

The transition from traditional, often linear, problem-solving approaches to the more demanding framework of Strategic Systems Thinking (SST) is not automatic. It requires a fundamental shift in perception, an ability to recognize when simpler methods are inadequate. This recognition is critically dependent on metacognitive knowledge – what an individual knows about their own thinking, the nature of cognitive tasks, and the strategies available for tackling them.

A. Components of Metacognitive Knowledge

Metacognitive knowledge encompasses several key areas 35:

• Self-Knowledge (Declarative Knowledge): This involves awareness of oneself as a thinker and learner.36 It includes understanding one's cognitive strengths and weaknesses 43, preferred learning styles, attentional limits, and how factors like motivation or emotion might influence cognitive performance.43 Crucially, it also includes awareness of one's own mental models—the internal frameworks used to understand the world—and how these shape perception and interpretation.20

• Knowledge of Cognitive Biases: A vital aspect of self-knowledge is the awareness that human cognition is susceptible to systematic errors and biases.20 These biases often stem from heuristics—mental shortcuts that prioritize efficiency over accuracy.55 Examples include confirmation bias (seeking confirming evidence), anchoring bias (over-relying on initial information), availability heuristic (overestimating easily recalled events), and blind spot bias (recognizing biases in others more readily than in oneself).28 Recognizing one's own vulnerability to these biases is a key metacognitive insight.37

• Task Knowledge: This refers to awareness of the nature, demands, and complexity of the task or problem at hand.43 It involves recognizing the characteristics of different types of problems—distinguishing well-structured problems with clear solutions from ill-structured, complex, or "wicked" problems that lack definitive formulations and involve ambiguity and uncertainty.11

• Strategy Knowledge (Procedural and Conditional Knowledge): This includes knowledge about various cognitive and problem-solving strategies (procedural knowledge) and understanding when, where, and why specific strategies are most effective (conditional knowledge).36 This encompasses knowing about different analytical frameworks, brainstorming techniques, modeling approaches, and evaluation methods.

B. How Metacognitive Knowledge Reveals Inadequacy of Linear Thinking

Metacognitive knowledge serves as a critical diagnostic tool, enabling individuals to assess the fit between their cognitive approach and the demands of the problem. When faced with complexity, this knowledge reveals the limitations of simplistic, linear thinking:

• Recognizing Problem Complexity: Metacognitive task knowledge allows an individual to identify when a problem exhibits characteristics of high complexity, interconnectedness, or "wickedness".20 Since linear thinking typically assumes well-structured problems with clear causality 91, recognizing a problem as ill-structured immediately signals the potential inadequacy of a linear approach.24

• Highlighting Cognitive Vulnerabilities: Awareness of one's own cognitive limitations (e.g., bounded rationality, susceptibility to information overload) and inherent biases 24 underscores the risks of relying on intuitive, fast, System 1 thinking 57 or oversimplified heuristics when dealing with multifaceted, dynamic issues.25 Linear thinking often defaults to these shortcuts, which are prone to error in complex contexts where assumptions of simplicity and direct causality do not hold.

• Contrasting Assumptions: Metacognitive knowledge about how systems function—even a basic understanding of concepts like interconnectedness, feedback loops, and non-linear dynamics 24—directly contradicts the core assumptions of linear thinking, which tends to treat elements in isolation and assumes direct, proportional cause-and-effect relationships.23 This conceptual clash highlights the mismatch between linear models and systemic reality.

This awareness of cognitive biases is not merely about recognizing personal failings; it points to the structural inadequacy of certain cognitive tools, like linear analysis, when applied to domains characterized by systemic complexity. Biases often arise from applying heuristics appropriate for simple situations to complex ones where their underlying assumptions are violated.55 Complex systems, with their feedback, delays, and emergent properties 1, inherently challenge the validity of these simple heuristics. Therefore, metacognitive awareness of bias in the context of a complex problem 20 reveals that the linear approach itself is often the source of the error, necessitating a shift towards methods like systems thinking designed to handle such complexity.

C. The Necessity of Systems Thinking Revealed

Metacognitive knowledge acts as the crucial catalyst for adopting SST. When an individual possesses the metacognitive awareness to:

1. Recognize that the problem at hand is complex and interconnected (Task Knowledge).

2. Understand that their default or preferred thinking styles (often linear) are prone to oversimplification and bias in such contexts (Self-Knowledge, Bias Knowledge).

3. Know that alternative approaches like systems thinking exist and are designed for complexity (Strategy Knowledge).

...then the necessity of shifting to a systems approach becomes evident.20 It is the conscious recognition of the mismatch between the problem's demands and the limitations of one's current cognitive tools that motivates the search for and adoption of a more suitable framework like SST.20 The internal realization, "My standard way of thinking is insufficient or likely to lead me astray here," is what drives the perceived need for systems thinking.

Furthermore, the development of metacognitive knowledge about systems concepts (e.g., understanding feedback, interconnectedness) may be a crucial precursor to recognizing the limitations of one's own linear mental models. Without a basic conceptual framework for "system," an individual may lack the lens to perceive when their non-systemic approach is failing.36 They might attribute failures or unexpected outcomes to external factors or bad luck, rather than to the inadequacy of their own linear model when applied to a systemic reality.24 Thus, acquiring some foundational knowledge of systems principles might be necessary before metacognitive awareness can effectively trigger the recognition that a deeper, more systemic approach is required.

The following table summarizes the contrast between linear and strategic systems thinking across key dimensions and highlights the metacognitive awareness required to appreciate the need for the latter when dealing with complexity.

Table 1: Linear vs. Strategic Systems Thinking & Required Metacognitive Awareness

Feature	Linear Thinking Approach	Strategic Systems Thinking Approach	Required Metacognitive Knowledge/Awareness for SST Necessity
Problem View	Isolated parts; Problem seen as discrete event	Interconnected whole; Problem seen as pattern/structure within a system 1	Awareness of interconnectedness; Knowledge of task complexity (ill-structured nature); Awareness of bias towards simplification.
Causality	Linear (A causes B); Focus on direct cause-effect	Circular (Feedback loops); Focus on mutual influence and dynamics 19	Awareness of feedback dynamics; Knowledge of non-linear relationships; Awareness of limitations in simple causal attribution.
Solution Approach	Single 'fix' or optimal solution; Focus on symptoms	Leverage points; Multiple interventions; Focus on underlying structures 1	Awareness of system structure; Knowledge of different intervention strategies; Awareness of bias towards immediate/obvious solutions.
Role of Context	Context often ignored or assumed stable	Context crucial; Boundaries explicitly considered; Multiple perspectives valued 1	Awareness of boundary definition importance; Knowledge of stakeholder perspectives; Awareness of how context influences system behavior.
Handling Feedback	Feedback often ignored, delayed, or seen as external noise	Feedback central to understanding and adaptation; Both reinforcing & balancing loops analyzed 23	Awareness of feedback loop types and effects; Knowledge of delays and their impact; Awareness of tendency to overlook feedback.
Time Horizon	Short-term focus; Reaction to immediate events	Long-term perspective; Focus on patterns over time; Future-oriented 29	Awareness of long-term consequences; Knowledge of dynamic behavior patterns; Awareness of bias towards short-term thinking.
Handling Uncertainty	Seeks certainty; Avoids ambiguity	Embraces uncertainty; Explores ambiguity; Adapts to change 12	Awareness of inherent uncertainty in complex systems; Knowledge of strategies for ambiguity tolerance; Awareness of personal discomfort with uncertainty and its potential bias on decisions.

This table illustrates that for each core aspect where SST differs from linear thinking, a corresponding form of metacognitive awareness is necessary to recognize the limitations of the simpler approach and appreciate the value and necessity of the systemic perspective when dealing with complex challenges.

IV. Metacognitive Monitoring: Discerning the Need for a Systemic Lens

While metacognitive knowledge provides the foundational understanding of why systems thinking might be necessary, metacognitive monitoring provides the real-time awareness needed to detect when a specific situation actually demands a systemic approach over simpler methods. Monitoring is the ongoing, in-the-moment assessment of one's cognitive activities, comprehension, and progress relative to a goal.34 It involves implicitly or explicitly asking questions like, "How am I doing?", "Does this make sense?", "Is my current approach working?".49

A. The Role of Metacognitive Monitoring

Effective metacognitive monitoring encompasses several functions relevant to navigating complexity:

• Tracking Understanding: This involves actively checking one's comprehension of the problem, the relationships between elements, the dynamics at play, and the information being processed.47 It means noticing moments of confusion, lack of clarity, cognitive dissonance, or when incoming information contradicts existing understanding.24

• Evaluating Mental Models: Monitoring includes assessing the adequacy and 'fit' of one's current mental models—the internal representations of how the system works—against observed system behavior or new data.20 This involves recognizing discrepancies, anomalies, or instances where the model fails to explain or predict what is happening.

• Assessing Assumptions: During analysis or problem-solving, monitoring can bring awareness to the underlying assumptions being made.97 It involves questioning whether these assumptions are valid in the current context or if they are being unduly influenced by biases or past experiences.

B. Identifying Systemic Complexity via Monitoring

The output of metacognitive monitoring provides crucial cues that signal the presence of systemic complexity and the inadequacy of non-systemic approaches:

• Detecting Anomalies and Counterintuitive Outcomes: When monitoring reveals that results are unexpected, predictions based on simple models fail, or interventions produce surprising or counterintuitive side effects, it strongly suggests the presence of underlying systemic structures like feedback loops, delays, or non-linear interactions.1 The failure of a simple explanation points towards a more complex reality.

• Recognizing Unforeseen Interdependencies: Actively monitoring the consequences of actions or decisions can reveal previously unnoticed connections between different parts of a system.1 For example, observing that a solution implemented in one department creates new problems in another highlights the interconnected nature of the system, a key indicator that a systemic perspective is needed.

• Struggling with Linear Frameworks: Persistent difficulty in forcing observations into a simple, linear cause-and-effect narrative is a key monitoring signal.24 When data seems contradictory, when multiple conflicting perspectives emerge that resist easy integration 91, or when simple models consistently fail to capture the observed behavior, monitoring flags the limitation of the linear approach and the likely need for systems thinking, which is better equipped to handle such complexity and multiplicity.

• Experiencing Cognitive Difficulty: Subjective feelings, when monitored, can also be informative. Experiencing persistent confusion, feeling overwhelmed by the number of interacting variables, being unable to see a clear path forward despite effort, or feeling "stuck" can be metacognitive signals that the current cognitive strategy is mismatched to the complexity of the task.24

Effective metacognitive monitoring in complex situations, therefore, requires more than just tracking factual comprehension. It necessitates actively scanning for patterns of behavior over time, looking for feedback effects, and remaining vigilant for unexpected consequences or counterintuitive results – the very hallmarks of systemic behavior.1 The monitoring process itself must become attuned to systemic phenomena to accurately gauge the need for a systems thinking approach. Simply monitoring "Do I understand this isolated piece of information?" is insufficient. The critical questions become "Is this pattern significant?", "Why did this unexpected outcome occur?", "How does this event relate to the broader structure?".

C. Triggering the Shift to Systems Thinking

The data gathered through metacognitive monitoring—whether it's the detection of confusion, failed predictions, awareness of anomalies, or the recognition of conflicting data—serves as a crucial trigger.38 This internal feedback signals that the current cognitive approach, often a default linear or reductionist one, is proving insufficient or generating errors. This awareness prompts the individual to pause, re-evaluate, and consciously consider switching to a more appropriate and powerful strategy, such as the tools and frameworks offered by systems thinking, to better grapple with the perceived complexity.

Conversely, a failure in metacognitive monitoring can actively prevent this necessary shift. If cognitive biases like overconfidence 90 or confirmation bias 28 impair the monitoring process, an individual may fail to notice the discrepancies between their simple model and the complex reality.38 They might explain away anomalies or ignore contradictory evidence. Without the accurate feedback from monitoring that signals the inadequacy of their current approach, the trigger to adopt systems thinking is never activated.38 As a result, the individual may persist in applying ineffective linear strategies, trapped by a breakdown in their metacognitive ability to accurately assess the situation and their own understanding of it.

V. Metacognitive Regulation: Steering the Application of Systems Thinking

Recognizing the need for systems thinking (through metacognitive knowledge) and detecting the specific situations where it is required (through metacognitive monitoring) are crucial first steps. However, effectively implementing Strategic Systems Thinking (SST) demands a further layer of metacognitive capability: metacognitive regulation. Regulation refers to the active control, direction, and management of one's own cognitive processes and learning strategies, guided by goals and the feedback from monitoring.34 It is the executive function that translates awareness into purposeful action and adaptation.

A. Components of Metacognitive Regulation

Metacognitive regulation involves several key activities:

• Planning: This is the deliberate forethought applied to tackling a complex problem using SST. It involves setting specific goals for the analysis, selecting appropriate systems thinking tools and methods (e.g., deciding to create a causal loop diagram, planning stakeholder interviews, choosing variables for a simulation model), allocating cognitive resources, and outlining the steps to be taken.35

• Controlling Biases: This involves the conscious and active effort to manage and mitigate the influence of known cognitive biases during the process of systemic analysis, interpretation, and decision-making.20 This requires intentionally engaging slower, more effortful System 2 thinking to override potentially misleading intuitive judgments from System 1.57 Strategies might include deliberately seeking out disconfirming evidence, actively questioning initial assumptions, employing structured analytical techniques, or assigning a 'devil's advocate' role within a team.28

• Evaluating Effectiveness: This component focuses on assessing the success and utility of the chosen cognitive strategies and the outcomes of the SST process itself.35 This includes judging the clarity and insightfulness of a system map, the validity of a simulation model 63, the effectiveness of a brainstormed set of interventions, or the actual impact of a tested policy based on systemic metrics.

• Adapting Understanding and Approach: Based on the feedback from monitoring and evaluation, regulation involves modifying one's mental models of the system, adjusting problem-solving strategies, changing plans, or even reframing the problem itself.34 This capacity for adaptation and flexibility is crucial for navigating the iterative and often unpredictable nature of working with complex systems.12

B. How Regulation Enables Effective Implementation of Strategic Systems Thinking

Metacognitive regulation is not peripheral to SST; it is integral to its effective execution:

• Purposeful Tool Application: SST offers a rich toolkit (causal loop diagrams, system maps, stock-and-flow models, archetypes, etc.).1 Metacognitive regulation ensures these tools are selected strategically and applied thoughtfully, tailored to the specific problem context and the goals of the analysis, rather than being used in a rote or mechanistic fashion. Regulation guides the planning of which tool to use, monitoring its application, and evaluating its usefulness in generating insight.

• Navigating Ambiguity and Uncertainty: Complex systems and strategic challenges are inherently characterized by ambiguity, incomplete information, and uncertainty about the future.24 Metacognitive regulation enables individuals and teams to manage this ambiguity effectively. It supports the conscious selection of strategies for exploring multiple possibilities (divergent thinking) 44, tolerating the discomfort of not knowing, planning iterative steps to reduce uncertainty (e.g., prototyping, experimentation) 81, and adapting plans as understanding evolves through monitoring and evaluation.38

• Maintaining Analytical Rigor: The active control of cognitive biases is particularly vital in SST.37 Analyzing complex systems often involves interpreting ambiguous data, dealing with multiple conflicting perspectives, and making judgments with significant strategic implications. Metacognitive regulation helps maintain analytical rigor by prompting checks for confirmation bias, anchoring effects, groupthink, or other distortions that could skew the understanding of the system or the evaluation of potential interventions.

• Facilitating Systemic Learning and Adaptation: Metacognitive regulation drives the learning cycle inherent in effective SST. By prompting evaluation of the effectiveness of interventions or the accuracy of system models 43, regulation ensures that feedback is incorporated. This leads to the adaptation and refinement of both the understanding of the system (mental models) and the strategies being employed.38 This iterative process of monitoring, evaluating, and adapting is essential for keeping the SST approach relevant and effective in dynamic and evolving environments.1 This connects strongly to the concept of double-loop learning, where not just actions but underlying assumptions are questioned and potentially revised.105

• Bridging Understanding and Action: Ultimately, metacognitive regulation connects the insights gained from systemic analysis to effective strategic action. It guides the planning of interventions based on identified leverage points, the monitoring of their implementation, and the evaluation of their outcomes against strategic goals, ensuring that understanding translates into purposeful change.13

Metacognitive regulation, therefore, is the engine that drives the iterative and adaptive nature of successful SST. Without the capacity to consciously plan, evaluate, control biases, and adapt based on feedback, the application of systems thinking risks becoming static, rigid, or derailed by cognitive errors, ultimately failing to effectively address the dynamic challenges it is intended to tackle.12 The control of cognitive biases through regulation is especially critical in the strategic aspect of SST. Because strategic decisions often involve high stakes, competing interests, and the potential for motivated reasoning (interpreting information in a way that supports pre-existing desires or goals), failure to regulate bias can lead to interventions that inadvertently serve hidden agendas or protect the status quo, rather than achieving the intended systemic improvements or strategic objectives.19 Conscious regulation is needed to ensure that the application of systems thinking remains focused on genuine understanding and effective, ethical action aligned with stated goals.

The following table illustrates how the components of metacognition (knowledge, monitoring, regulation) are essential throughout the various phases and activities involved in applying Strategic Systems Thinking.

Table 2: Role of Metacognitive Components in Strategic Systems Thinking Activities

Strategic Systems Thinking Activity	Key Metacognitive Knowledge Required	Key Metacognitive Monitoring Activities	Key Metacognitive Regulation Activities
Problem Framing / Boundary Setting	Awareness of task complexity (wickedness); Knowledge of different framing options; Awareness of own biases/assumptions influencing framing; Knowledge of stakeholders.	Assessing clarity of problem definition; Monitoring assumptions about system boundaries; Checking if key perspectives are included/excluded.	Planning the framing process (e.g., stakeholder engagement); Controlling tendency to define problem too narrowly/broadly; Evaluating chosen frame against strategic goals; Adapting frame based on initial exploration.
Identifying Interconnections/Feedback	Knowledge of systems concepts (feedback loops, delays, non-linearity); Knowledge of mapping techniques (e.g., CLDs); Awareness of confirmation bias.	Tracking understanding of causal links; Monitoring for unexpected connections; Assessing the completeness of feedback loop identification; Checking for bias in interpreting relationships.	Planning the mapping approach; Selecting appropriate mapping tools; Controlling bias towards simple/linear causality; Evaluating the map's explanatory power; Revising map based on new data or insights.
Developing Mental Models	Awareness of mental models & their influence; Knowledge of system archetypes; Understanding of stock/flow dynamics; Awareness of limitations of own understanding.	Assessing the coherence and consistency of the mental model; Monitoring fit between model and observed behavior; Checking for internal contradictions; Evaluating reliance on assumptions.	Planning model development activities; Actively seeking diverse data to inform the model; Controlling oversimplification; Evaluating model against reality/data; Adapting/refining the model based on discrepancies (learning).
Identifying Leverage Points	Knowledge of different types of leverage points (Meadows' hierarchy); Understanding of system dynamics & sensitivity; Awareness of potential unintended consequences.	Assessing the potential impact of intervening at different points; Monitoring assumptions about intervention effects; Tracking alignment with strategic goals; Evaluating feasibility of intervention.	Planning which leverage points to analyze; Controlling bias towards obvious but low-leverage points; Prioritizing leverage points based on potential impact and feasibility; Evaluating chosen points against strategic criteria.
Designing & Testing Interventions	Knowledge of intervention design strategies; Understanding of potential resistance to change; Awareness of implementation challenges; Knowledge of testing methods.	Monitoring the design process; Tracking assumptions about intervention effectiveness; Assessing potential side effects; Evaluating feasibility and stakeholder acceptance.	Planning intervention design & testing (e.g., pilots, simulations); Controlling biases in solution design; Selecting appropriate testing methods; Evaluating test results against predicted outcomes; Adapting intervention based on tests.
Evaluating Systemic Outcomes	Knowledge of systemic evaluation metrics; Understanding long-term dynamics; Awareness of attribution challenges in complex systems.	Monitoring actual system behavior post-intervention; Tracking intended and unintended outcomes over time; Assessing alignment with long-term strategic goals.	Planning the evaluation process; Selecting appropriate systemic metrics; Controlling bias in interpreting results; Evaluating overall effectiveness and sustainability; Adapting future strategies based on evaluation (double-loop learning).

This table underscores that metacognition is not a separate activity but an interwoven capability essential for navigating each stage of the strategic systems thinking process, from initial framing to final evaluation and adaptation.

VI. Reflective Systems Practice: Deepening Insight and Adapting Strategy

The integration of metacognition with strategic systems thinking culminates in what can be termed "Reflective Systems Practice." This represents a mature capability where reflective methods are deliberately employed not only to improve one's own thinking processes but also to deepen the understanding of complex systems and enhance the effectiveness of strategic interventions within them.34 It is the conscious and skillful combination of looking inward (metacognition, reflection) and looking outward systemically.

A. Defining Reflective Systems Practice

Reflective Systems Practice involves more than simply thinking about past actions. It is characterized by:

• Synergistic Integration: It actively combines the principles and tools of systems thinking with the processes of metacognition and reflective practice.34 Reflection is used as a tool to probe systemic understanding, while systems concepts (like feedback, boundaries, leverage points) provide frameworks or lenses for the reflection itself.103 Metacognition oversees this entire process, monitoring the quality of both the systemic analysis and the reflection.

• Systemic Lenses for Reflection: Unlike generic reflection, Reflective Systems Practice uses systems concepts to structure the inquiry. Instead of just asking "What happened?", one might ask "What feedback loops were operating?", "How did the defined boundaries influence the outcome?", "What perspectives were missing?", or "Where might leverage points have existed?". Frameworks like "What? So What? Now What? What role have I played?" 98 become powerful when the "So What?" and "Now What?" are analyzed through a systemic lens, considering interconnections and potential future dynamics.

• Incorporating Schön's Reflective Practice: It embodies Donald Schön's concepts of "reflection-in-action" (thinking systemically while engaged in the situation) and "reflection-on-action" (analyzing systemic experiences retrospectively).48 Furthermore, it facilitates "double-loop learning," which moves beyond adjusting actions within the existing framework (single-loop) to questioning and potentially reframing the underlying assumptions, mental models, and goals that define the framework itself.105

B. Enhancing System Understanding through Reflection

Applying reflection through a systemic lens significantly deepens understanding:

• Revealing Hidden Structures and Dynamics: Structured reflection, prompted by systems-oriented questions, helps practitioners uncover the often-invisible structures, feedback loops, delays, and behavioral patterns driving system outcomes.103 Reflecting on a series of events over time, for example, can reveal recurring archetypes or dominant feedback loops that might be missed in a static analysis.

• Identifying Leverage Points: Reflecting on past interventions, system failures, or successes, specifically asking why certain actions had disproportionately large (or small) effects, can illuminate potential leverage points.70 Reflection connects experiential learning to strategic opportunities within the system's structure.

• Anticipating Consequences Systemically: Reflective practice encourages a more thorough consideration of potential future states and the ripple effects of proposed actions.19 Asking "What might happen if we intervene here, considering the known feedback loops and interconnections?" fosters proactive thinking about unintended consequences.

• Deepening Understanding of Perspectives: Metacognitive reflection on different stakeholder viewpoints, including a critical examination of one's own biases, assumptions, and role within the system, leads to a more nuanced appreciation of the system's social, political, and cultural dimensions.103 This is crucial for understanding resistance, building consensus, and designing feasible interventions.

This reflective process enables a form of "double-loop learning" about the system itself. It encourages practitioners to move beyond simply adjusting their strategies or actions within their current understanding of the system (single-loop learning: "Are we doing things right?"). It prompts them to question the validity and completeness of their underlying mental models, assumptions about causality, the definition of system boundaries, and even the perceived goals of the system (double-loop learning: "Are we viewing the system correctly?" and "Are we pursuing the right goals within this system?").54 Metacognition acts as the monitor for this deeper, more critical reflective inquiry.115

C. Adapting Systemic Strategies through Reflection

Reflective Systems Practice is central to the adaptive management required in complex, dynamic environments:

• Learning from Systemic Experience: Reflection provides the mechanism for extracting meaningful learning from the outcomes of systems interventions, whether successful or not.54 This learning directly informs the adaptation and refinement of future strategies, forming the core of adaptive management cycles.12

• Refining Systemic Mental Models: Through reflection on discrepancies between expected and actual system behavior, practitioners can consciously examine, challenge, and update their mental models of the system.20 This leads to more accurate internal representations and, consequently, better-informed strategic choices.

• Enhancing Cognitive Flexibility and Adaptability: Regularly engaging in reflective systems practice cultivates cognitive flexibility—the ability to shift perspectives, consider alternatives, and adjust approaches.38 This adaptability is essential for practitioners to remain effective as the complex systems they work within inevitably evolve and present new challenges.

The emphasis on "practice" highlights that this capability is not merely an intellectual exercise but an embodied skill developed through ongoing, conscious effort and experience.103 It is this practiced ability to reflect systemically, both during action (reflection-in-action) and afterwards (reflection-on-action), that enables effective navigation and intervention within the persistent ambiguity and dynamism of complex systems.1 It allows for continuous learning and adaptation within the unfolding complexity, not just as a post-hoc analysis.

VII. Metacognition and Strategic Systems Thinking in Action: Illustrative Cases

The symbiotic relationship between metacognition and Strategic Systems Thinking (SST) becomes clearer when examining specific contexts where complex, interconnected, or "wicked" problems are prevalent. Fields such as public policy, organizational change, and complex design projects serve as potent examples illustrating how metacognitive awareness, monitoring, and regulation are essential for the successful application of SST.

A. Public Policy Making / Climate Change / Sustainability

• The Challenge: Public policy domains, particularly those concerning global challenges like climate change and sustainable development, represent archetypal wicked problems.2 These issues involve intricate interactions between environmental, economic, social, and political systems across multiple scales.2 They feature long time delays between actions and consequences, significant uncertainty, deeply embedded feedback loops (e.g., climate feedback mechanisms, economic responses to regulations), and diverse stakeholders with conflicting interests and values.2 Linear, siloed approaches are demonstrably insufficient for addressing such interconnected challenges.2

• SST Application: SST is increasingly recognized as essential for effective policy formulation and implementation in these areas.2 Applications include mapping complex causal relationships and feedback loops (e.g., using causal loop diagrams or system dynamics models to understand the interplay between emissions, economy, and environment) 64, defining appropriate system boundaries (e.g., considering global impacts vs. national policies) 2, integrating diverse stakeholder perspectives through collaborative processes 2, identifying high-leverage policy interventions (e.g., targeting key feedback loops or system rules) 70, and designing policies for long-term resilience and adaptability.2 The focus shifts from isolated fixes to understanding and influencing systemic properties like tipping points and interconnectedness.2

• Role of Metacognition:

• Knowledge: Policymakers require metacognitive awareness of the inherent complexity and uncertainty of these systems.20 They must recognize their own potential biases, such as short-term political thinking, confirmation bias favoring preferred policy options, or oversimplification of intricate dynamics.28 Knowledge of the limitations of traditional forecasting models and the need for systemic approaches is crucial.2

• Monitoring: Effective policy design demands ongoing monitoring of one's understanding of the complex interactions (e.g., economic repercussions of environmental regulations, social equity impacts).12 It involves critically evaluating the assumptions embedded within policy models and simulations 24 and actively scanning for early signs of unintended consequences or policy resistance during implementation.64

• Regulation: Metacognitive regulation guides the policy process. This includes planning for multi-stakeholder engagement and diverse perspective integration 2, consciously controlling for biases in policy analysis and option selection 55, evaluating policy effectiveness using systemic indicators rather than narrow metrics 120, and embracing adaptive management approaches that allow for policy adjustments based on real-world feedback and evolving understanding.2

• Impact of Metacognitive Failure: A lack of metacognitive awareness or regulation in policymakers can lead to significant failures. Overconfidence in simplistic solutions, failure to recognize critical feedback loops or interconnections, ignoring dissenting perspectives due to confirmation bias, or an inability to adapt policies in the face of new evidence can result in ineffective, costly, or even counterproductive interventions that worsen the very problems they aim to solve.19

B. Organizational Change / Transformation

• The Challenge: Implementing significant organizational change or transformation is inherently complex, involving not just structures and processes but also deeply ingrained cultures, individual and group behaviors, power dynamics, and potential resistance.67 Interventions frequently trigger unintended consequences, and success often depends on understanding the interplay of numerous factors.19

• SST Application: Systems thinking provides a valuable framework for navigating organizational change.31 It involves mapping organizational structures, workflows, and communication patterns 31; identifying key feedback loops that may support or hinder change (e.g., reinforcing loops of resistance, balancing loops related to performance pressures) 122; understanding the perspectives and mental models of different stakeholders (e.g., leadership, middle management, frontline employees) 31; identifying leverage points where interventions are likely to have the greatest positive impact 67; and designing holistic, integrated change strategies rather than piecemeal initiatives.67

• Role of Metacognition:

• Knowledge: Leaders driving change need metacognitive awareness of the organization as a complex adaptive system.31 They must understand their own assumptions about how the organization works, potential biases regarding the need for change or preferred solutions (e.g., favoring top-down directives), and knowledge of various change management models and their applicability.28

• Monitoring: This involves tracking the progress of the change initiative against goals, monitoring employee responses, morale, and engagement.122 It requires evaluating whether the chosen change approach fits the organizational culture and assessing the validity of assumptions about how interventions will impact behavior and performance.24

• Regulation: Metacognitive regulation is key to steering the change process. This includes planning the change inclusively, involving stakeholders at multiple levels 123; actively controlling for leadership biases or blind spots 28; evaluating the effectiveness of change interventions through systemic feedback 122; and crucially, adapting the change strategy iteratively based on emergent challenges, resistance, or new insights gained during the process.67

• Impact of Metacognitive Failure: Change initiatives often fail when leaders lack metacognitive insight. Proceeding with flawed assumptions about the organization, ignoring employee perspectives due to bias, failing to monitor the systemic impacts of interventions, or rigidly adhering to an initial plan despite evidence it's not working can lead to increased resistance, wasted resources, damaged trust, and ultimately, the failure of the transformation effort.28

C. Complex Design Projects (e.g., Strategic Design, Healthcare Improvement)

• The Challenge: Design, particularly strategic design, service design, or design aimed at improving complex systems like healthcare, frequently deals with ill-defined or wicked problems.9 These projects involve understanding complex user needs within broader ecosystems, navigating ambiguity, balancing desirability with feasibility and viability, managing multiple stakeholders, and fostering innovation under uncertainty.5 Healthcare improvement provides a specific example, requiring understanding of interacting clinical, administrative, and patient systems.5

• SST Application: Systems thinking is increasingly integrated into design methodologies, often under labels like Strategic Design or Systemic Design.9 This involves mapping user journeys or service blueprints (a form of system mapping) 70, understanding the broader context and ecosystem in which a product or service exists 82, identifying feedback loops affecting user experience or service delivery 70, considering the needs and perspectives of diverse stakeholders 5, finding leverage points for meaningful innovation 70, and employing iterative cycles of prototyping, testing, and refinement.38

• Role of Metacognition:

• Knowledge: Designers benefit from metacognitive awareness of the inherent ambiguity in design problems.38 They need knowledge of their own creative strengths, weaknesses, and biases (e.g., fixation on early ideas, aesthetic preferences overriding usability) 38, as well as a repertoire of design methods and strategies and when to apply them.44

• Monitoring: Metacognitive monitoring is crucial throughout the design process.38 This includes tracking progress against project goals, assessing the effectiveness of chosen methods (e.g., "Is this brainstorming technique generating diverse ideas?"), evaluating how well prototypes or solutions meet user needs and business objectives, and checking assumptions about users, context, or technical feasibility.

• Regulation: Designers use metacognitive regulation to plan their design process (e.g., structuring research, ideation, prototyping phases) 38, control cognitive obstacles like fixation or premature judgment during creative phases 38, evaluate design iterations based on user feedback and strategic criteria 38, and adapt the design direction based on learning and insights gained through testing.38

• Impact of Metacognitive Failure: Designers lacking metacognitive skills may struggle with the ambiguity of complex problems, becoming fixated on initial concepts, failing to adequately empathize with diverse user needs, overlooking critical system constraints (e.g., technical, organizational), or producing designs that are aesthetically pleasing but strategically misaligned, unusable, or unsustainable.38 Research indicates high-performing design students engage more in metacognitive processes like planning, monitoring, and evaluation.38

Across these diverse fields, a consistent pattern emerges. When metacognition is absent or weak, decision-makers tend to default to familiar, often linear or reductionist, approaches even when faced with systemic complexity. This occurs because they fail to recognize the nature of the problem, are unaware of their own biases favoring simpler solutions, or do not effectively monitor the (often negative) consequences of applying inappropriate methods.19 Conversely, the successful application of SST appears deeply intertwined with metacognitive capabilities.

Furthermore, tackling complex systemic problems effectively often necessitates moving beyond individual cognition to foster collaborative metacognition and reflection.5 Teams and groups need processes that enable them to collectively surface and challenge assumptions, monitor their shared understanding of the system, evaluate the effectiveness of their joint strategies, and regulate their collaborative approach. Practices like reflective blogging within a group, facilitated dialogue, and ensuring diverse perspectives are actively sought and integrated point towards the importance of group-level metacognitive processes for successful systems intervention.28

VIII. Synthesis and Conclusion: Why Metacognition Makes Systems Thinking Necessary

The exploration undertaken in this report reveals a deep and intricate relationship between metacognition and Strategic Systems Thinking (SST). The analysis demonstrates that metacognition is not merely an advantageous adjunct to SST but an essential prerequisite and ongoing enabler for its effective application, particularly when confronting complex, dynamic, and uncertain challenges.

A. Recapitulation of the Argument

The preceding sections have established several key points:

• Strategic Systems Thinking provides a necessary framework and a set of principles (holism, interconnectedness, feedback, emergence, boundaries, perspectives) and tools (mapping, modeling) for understanding and intervening in complex systems to achieve long-term goals. It offers a crucial alternative to linear, reductionist approaches that often fail in such contexts.

• Metacognitive Knowledge—awareness of one's own thinking processes, cognitive limitations, biases, task complexity, and strategic options—is required to recognize the limitations of simpler thinking styles and appreciate the necessity of adopting a systemic approach when faced with complexity. It allows individuals to diagnose the mismatch between their default cognitive tools and the demands of the problem.

• Metacognitive Monitoring—the real-time tracking of comprehension, assessment of mental models, and evaluation of assumptions—is essential to detect the specific cues (e.g., anomalies, counterintuitive results, persistent confusion) that signal the presence of systemic complexity and trigger the need to apply a systems lens.

• Metacognitive Regulation—the active control processes of planning, managing biases, evaluating strategy effectiveness, and adapting understanding and approach—is indispensable for effectively implementing SST. It guides the purposeful application of systems tools, enables navigation of ambiguity, maintains analytical rigor, drives iterative learning, and connects systemic insight to strategic action.

• Reflective Systems Practice emerges as the integration of these capabilities, where deliberate reflection, guided by systems principles and overseen by metacognition, deepens systemic understanding, reveals leverage points, anticipates consequences, and facilitates the adaptation of strategies within complex, evolving systems.

B. The Indispensable Link

The connection between metacognition and SST is synergistic and fundamental. SST provides the conceptual framework and the methodological tools needed to grapple with complexity. However, metacognition provides the essential awareness, discernment, judgment, and control required to wield that framework and those tools effectively and appropriately. Without robust metacognitive capabilities:

• The fundamental need to employ systems thinking in the first place might go unrecognized, as the individual remains unaware of the problem's complexity or the limitations of their own linear thinking (a failure of metacognitive knowledge and monitoring).

• Systems thinking tools and concepts might be applied superficially, mechanistically, or incorrectly, failing to yield genuine insight (a failure of metacognitive knowledge and regulation).

• Cognitive biases—such as confirmation bias, anchoring, or oversimplification—inherent in the analysis of complex, often value-laden systems could proceed unchecked, distorting understanding and leading to flawed conclusions or interventions (a failure of metacognitive knowledge, monitoring, and regulation).

• Mental models of the system could remain rigid and outdated, preventing adaptation even when confronted with contradictory evidence or feedback (a failure of metacognitive monitoring and regulation).

• Strategic interventions derived from systems analysis might fail due to inadequate planning, insufficient evaluation of potential consequences, or an inability to adapt the strategy based on real-world outcomes (a failure of metacognitive regulation).

C. Necessity, Not Just Benefit

Therefore, the central argument of this report is that metacognition makes the effective use of Strategic Systems Thinking necessary, not merely beneficial. In the complex, uncertain, and dynamic environments that characterize contemporary challenges—where linear approaches demonstrably fail and cognitive biases are pervasive—metacognition acts as the crucial enabling factor.20 It allows individuals and groups to consciously bridge the gap between the complexity of the external world and the inherent limitations and potential pitfalls of their internal cognitive worlds. It transforms SST from a potentially powerful but difficult-to-master methodology into a practical and adaptable capability for navigating complexity. The capacity for self-aware, self-regulated systemic thinking is what underpins successful understanding, decision-making, and action in the face of wickedness.

This conclusion carries significant implications. Efforts aimed at enhancing capacity for complex problem-solving—whether in education, leadership development, policy analysis, or design training—must move beyond simply teaching the tools and concepts of systems thinking. They must concurrently focus on cultivating the underlying metacognitive skills: fostering self-awareness of thinking patterns and biases, developing skills in monitoring understanding and assumptions, and strengthening the ability to plan, evaluate, and regulate cognitive strategies.36 Without this dual focus, interventions aimed at promoting systems thinking may yield limited results, as learners may possess the tools but lack the metacognitive capacity to apply them effectively when it matters most.

Ultimately, the intertwined necessity of Strategic Systems Thinking and metacognition suggests that addressing the world's most pressing complex challenges requires more than just better analytical methods. It demands a fundamental shift towards greater self-awareness and epistemic humility.20 It requires acknowledging the inherent complexity of reality, the limitations of our own mental models, the pervasive influence of cognitive biases, and the likelihood that simple solutions are inadequate.11 Effectively navigating complexity necessitates a more humble, reflective, adaptive, and systemic approach, grounded firmly in the practice of metacognitive self-awareness and regulation.

Works cited

1. Applications of Systems Thinking - Systems Thinking Framework - SixSigma.us, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.6sigma.us/systems-thinking/systems-thinking-framework/

2. Systemic Thinking for Policy Making - OECD, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/systemic-thinking-for-policy-making_879c4f7a-en.html

3. What Are Wicked Problems and How Might We Solve Them? | IxDF, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/wicked-problems-5-steps-to-help-you-tackle-wicked-problems-by-combining-systems-thinking-with-agile-methodology

4. Systems Thinking for Sustainable Development, Climate Change and the Environment, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322235148_Systems_Thinking_for_Sustainable_Development_Climate_Change_and_the_Environment

5. Utilizing a Systems and Design Thinking Approach for Improving Well-Being within Health Professions' Education and Health Care - NAM, accessed April 29, 2025, https://nam.edu/perspectives/utilizing-a-systems-and-design-thinking-approach-for-improving-well-being-within-health-professions-education-and-health-care/

6. Why systems thinking is important for the education sector, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.edt.org/research-and-insights/why-systems-thinking-is-important-for-the-education-sector/

7. Development and application of 'systems thinking' principles for quality improvement - PMC, accessed April 29, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7103793/

8. Revitalizing the Schools: A Systems Thinking Approach, accessed April 29, 2025, https://thesystemsthinker.com/revitalizing-the-schools-a-systems-thinking-approach/

9. Strategy Design System - R3ASON, accessed April 29, 2025, https://r3ason.io/news/strategy-design-system-a-structured-approach-to-solving-complex-challenges

10. Design for complexity: - UCDA, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.ucda.com/design-for-complexity/

11. Wicked problem - Wikipedia, accessed April 29, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wicked_problem

12. Systems thinking and systemic design: working with complexity - Learning for Sustainability, accessed April 29, 2025, https://learningforsustainability.net/post/systems-design-intro/

13. Systems Thinking for Principals of Learning- Focused Schools - ERIC, accessed April 29, 2025, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1228602.pdf

14. 5 ways to better teach systems thinking skills in education | World Economic Forum, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/11/systems-thinking-has-great-potential-in-education-here-are-5-ways-to-deliver-it/

15. Systems Thinking for Sustainable Development: Climate Change and the Environment - Amazon.com, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.amazon.com/Systems-Thinking-Sustainable-Development-Environment/dp/3319705849

16. Systems Thinking - Health Innovation West of England, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.healthinnowest.net/toolkits-and-resources/quality-improvement-tools-2/what-is-systems-thinking/

17. The 10 Characteristics of "Wicked Problems" - Resonance Global, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.resonanceglobal.com/blog/the-characteristics-of-wicked-problems

18. What are Wicked Problems? | IxDF - The Interaction Design Foundation, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/topics/wicked-problems

19. Five Principles for Improved Systems Thinking - Community Science, accessed April 30, 2025, https://communityscience.com/health-and-behavioral-health-equity/five-principles-for-improved-systems-thinking/

20. Learning Systems Thinking at the Graduate Level - The Cornell ..., accessed April 30, 2025, https://www.cornellpolicyreview.com/learning-systems-thinking-at-the-graduate-level/

21. Thinking in Systems: International Bestseller: Donella H. Meadows, Diana Wright, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.amazon.com/Thinking-Systems-Donella-H-Meadows/dp/1603580557

22. Thinking in Systems | Chelsea Green Publishing, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.chelseagreen.com/product/thinking-in-systems/

23. What is Systems Thinking? Everything You Need to Know (2025) - SixSigma.us, accessed April 30, 2025, https://www.6sigma.us/systems-thinking/what-is-systems-thinking/

24. 4. Self-Awareness as a Foundational Skill - Learning Systems ..., accessed April 30, 2025, https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/learning-systems-thinking/9781098151324/ch04.html

25. The Limitations of Linear Thinking | Heutagogy Community of Practice, accessed April 30, 2025, https://heutagogycop.wordpress.com/2013/08/26/the-limitations-of-linear-thinking/

26. How to Create the Systems Thinking Diagrams - Designorate, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.designorate.com/system-thinking-diagrams/

27. Strategic design: building opportunities and trust in the future - MAIZE, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.maize.io/work/strategic-design-building-opportunities-and-trust-in-a-future/

28. The impact of cognitive biases, mental models, and mindsets on ..., accessed April 30, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11044509/

29. STRATEGIC AND SYSTEMS THINKING - Lenus the Irish Health Repository, accessed April 30, 2025, https://www.lenus.ie/bitstream/handle/10147/42702/2084.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

30. Principles of Systems Thinking | Blenderbox, accessed April 30, 2025, https://blenderbox.com/field-notes/principles-of-systems-thinking/

31. Systems Thinking in Business. How does it Improve Workplaces ..., accessed April 30, 2025, https://www.6sigma.us/systems-thinking/systems-thinking-in-business/

32. Design Thinking, Systems Thinking, Strategic Thinking: All the same?, accessed April 30, 2025, https://www.focusedmomentum.com/blog/design-thinking-systems-thinking-strategic-thinking-all-the-same

33. Introduction to Systems Thinking - The Systems Thinker, accessed April 30, 2025, https://thesystemsthinker.com/introduction-to-systems-thinking/

34. The case for metacognitive reflection: a theory integrative review with implications for medical education, accessed April 30, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11368986/

35. Learning from learning logs: A case study of metacognition in the primary school classroom. - University of Stirling, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.stir.ac.uk/research/hub/file/1410347

36. Metacognitive strategies to grow students' independent thinking - Turnitin, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.turnitin.com/blog/metacognitive-strategies-to-grow-students-independent-thinking

37. Metacognition and emotion – how accurate perception of own ..., accessed April 29, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7322564/

38. Metacognition in Design and Design Education - CDN, accessed April 29, 2025, https://bpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/websites.harvard.edu/dist/a/108/files/2024/06/Metacognition-in-Design-and-Design-Education_Handout.pdf

39. Applying Multiple, Triangulated, and Mixed-Methods Approaches for an Encompassing Measure of Metacognitive Awareness - ERIC, accessed April 29, 2025, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1224158.pdf

40. Validation of the Shortened Version of the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory in Spanish University Students - Psicothema, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.psicothema.com/pdf/4766.pdf

41. (PDF) A Case Study of Using Metacognitive Reflections to Enhance Writing Skills and Strategies in an Agricultural Media Writing Course - ResearchGate, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317308022_A_Case_Study_of_Using_Metacognitive_Reflections_to_Enhance_Writing_Skills_and_Strategies_in_an_Agricultural_Media_Writing_Course

42. The Correlation Between Metacognitive Awareness Level and Self-Directed Learning Readiness of Undergraduate Nursingand Midwifery - ERIC, accessed April 29, 2025, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1208411.pdf

43. Full article: Metacognitive self-knowledge and cognitive skills in project-based learning of high school electronics students - Taylor & Francis Online, accessed April 30, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03043797.2024.2374479

44. Embedding Metacognitive Skills in Spatial Design Education - IJICC, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.ijicc.net/images/Vol2iss2/Embedding_Metacognitive_Skills__McAuliffe_et_al.pdf

45. VALIDITY OF METACOGNITIVE AWARENESS INVENTORY AS A MEASURING TOOL FOR METACOGNITIVE ABILITY IN MATHEMATICS PROBLEM SOLVING - Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, accessed April 29, 2025, https://ojs.journalsdg.org/jlss/article/download/2246/1431/11882

46. Reliability and Validity of a State Metacognitive Inventory: Potential for Alternative Assessment - CRESST, accessed April 29, 2025, https://cresst.org/wp-content/uploads/TECH469.pdf

47. Metacognitive Awareness and Its Relation to Students' Academic Achievement - Education in Medicine Journal, accessed April 29, 2025, https://eduimed.usm.my/EIMJ20231504/EIMJ20231504_04.pdf

48. Enabling metacognition with learning design, accessed April 29, 2025, https://ding.global/enabling-metacognition-with-learning-design/

49. Metacognitive Awareness Inventory, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.rcsj.edu/Tutoring-site/Gloucester-site/Documents/Metacognitive%20Awareness%20Inventory.pdf

50. Metacognitive Strategies and Development of Critical Thinking in Higher Education - PMC, accessed April 30, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9242397/

51. (PDF) Developing and Validating a Measurement of Systems ..., accessed April 30, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377871109_Developing_and_Validating_a_Measurement_of_Systems_Thinking_The_Systems_Thinking_and_Metacognitive_Inventory_STMI

52. agdevresearch.org, accessed April 30, 2025, https://agdevresearch.org/index.php/aad/article/download/21/11/199

53. 'Thinking about thinking': Soldiers Have a Better Way to Solve Problems - AUSA, accessed April 30, 2025, https://www.ausa.org/articles/%E2%80%98thinking-about-thinking%E2%80%99-soldiers-have-better-way-solve-problems

54. cee.ucdavis.edu, accessed April 30, 2025, https://cee.ucdavis.edu/sites/g/files/dgvnsk5371/files/inline-files/Reflection%20%26%20Metacognition%20FULL.pdf

55. Bias, metacognition, and their roles in our critical thinking | I.M. ..., accessed April 30, 2025, https://immattersacp.org/archives/2020/02/bias-metacognition-and-their-roles-in-our-critical-thinking.htm

56. Atwood | The Critical Thinking Path to Controlling Cognitive Bias, accessed April 30, 2025, https://d2leuf3vilid4d.cloudfront.net/-/media/Global-Site/Content/Resources/COABE-reports/COABE-July-2022/ATWOOD-THE-CRITICAL-THINKING-PATH.ashx?rev=1580cc43702046df84234db9d4368476&hash=B69DC05F81D4A603DF1DBC19285EE7EE

57. System 1 and System 2 Thinking - The Decision Lab, accessed April 30, 2025, https://thedecisionlab.com/reference-guide/philosophy/system-1-and-system-2-thinking

58. Systems 1 and 2 thinking processes and cognitive reflection testing in medical students, accessed April 30, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5344059/

59. Metacognition & Critical Thinking: What's The Connection?, accessed April 30, 2025, https://www.globalmetacognition.com/post/metacognition-critical-thinking-what-s-the-connection

60. Systems Thinking: What, Why, When, Where ... - The Systems Thinker, accessed April 30, 2025, https://thesystemsthinker.com/systems-thinking-what-why-when-where-and-how/

61. What Is Systems Thinking? | University of Phoenix, accessed April 30, 2025, https://www.phoenix.edu/blog/what-is-systems-thinking.html

62. Systems Thinking - Henrico Dolfing, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.henricodolfing.com/2017/05/systems-thinking.html

63. (PDF) What Constitutes Systems Thinking? A Proposed Taxonomy, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255592974_What_Constitutes_Systems_Thinking_A_Proposed_Taxonomy

64. Systems Thinking: A Holistic Approach to Problem-Solving - EvalCommunity, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.evalcommunity.com/career-center/systems-thinking/

65. Principles of Systems Thinking - SEBoK, accessed April 30, 2025, https://sebokwiki.org/wiki/Principles_of_Systems_Thinking

66. Systems Thinking - GSA Sustainable Facilities Tool, accessed April 29, 2025, https://sftool.gov/plan/250/systems-thinking

67. Systems Thinking: The Ultimate Guide for Organizational Change - Agility at Scale, accessed April 29, 2025, https://agility-at-scale.com/principles/systems-thinking-org-change/

68. Systems thinking - ahpsr, accessed April 29, 2025, https://ahpsr.who.int/what-we-do/thematic-areas-of-focus/systems-thinking

69. System dynamics - Wikipedia, accessed April 29, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_dynamics

70. Systems Mapping - NPC - New Philanthropy Capital (NPC), accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.thinknpc.org/resource-hub/systems-practice-toolkit/systems-mapping/

71. Leverage Points: Leverage Points: Strategic Interventions in Systems Thinking - FasterCapital, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.fastercapital.com/content/Leverage-Points--Leverage-Points--Strategic-Interventions-in-Systems-Thinking.html

72. System Dynamics/Systems Thinking? - ResearchGate, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/post/System_Dynamics_Systems_Thinking

73. 1 What Constitutes Systems Thinking? A Proposed Taxonomy Krystyna Stave and Megan Hopper1 UNLV Department of Environmental Stu, accessed April 29, 2025, http://static.clexchange.org/ftp/conference/CLE_2010/CO2010-06Session5MeasureST.pdf

74. Systems thinking and System Dynamics courses at MIT | MIT Sloan Executive Education, accessed April 29, 2025, https://exec.mit.edu/s/topic/systemsthinking

75. Systems Thinking: A Critical Set of Critical Thinking Skills for the 90's and Beyond - Proceedings, accessed April 29, 2025, https://proceedings.systemdynamics.org/1990/proceed/pdfs/richm934.pdf

76. Book Summary: Thinking in Systems by Donella Meadows - To ..., accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.tosummarise.com/book-summary-thinking-in-systems-by-donella-meadows/

77. Thinking In Systems | Summary & Notes - Will Patrick, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.willpatrick.co.uk/notes/thinking-in-systems-donella-meadows

78. www.cambridge.org, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/50288BD982A1105B6D56E2DDEA062A7C/S2220434219001124a.pdf/an-introductory-review-of-methods-for-the-articulation-of-strategy-in-design.pdf

79. Strategic Design Part I - Over The Horizon Journal, accessed April 29, 2025, https://othjournal.com/2018/03/12/strategic-design-part-i/

80. Strategic Design: A Sure Step to Future-proofing your Business in 2023 - Stan Branding, accessed April 29, 2025, https://stanbranding.com/blog/strategic-design-a-sure-step-to-future-proofing-your-business/

81. What is strategic design? A guide to your business success, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.future-processing.com/blog/strategic-design/

82. The Ultimate Guide To Strategic Design | Untaylored, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.untaylored.com/post/the-ultimate-guide-to-strategic-design-dd78d

83. Strategic design: aim, process, and features | Wishdesk, accessed April 29, 2025, https://wishdesk.com/blog/stratetic-design-process

84. Strategic design - Wikipedia, accessed April 29, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_design

85. Full article: Systems thinking for sustainability: shifting to a higher level of systems consciousness - Taylor & Francis Online, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01605682.2025.2486698?src=

86. Strategic Design: 6 Steps For Building Successful Websites - Smashing Magazine, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.smashingmagazine.com/2008/11/strategic-design-6-steps-for-building-successful-websites/

87. Strategic Design in the Professional Services - Hinge Marketing, accessed April 29, 2025, https://hingemarketing.com/blog/story/strategic-design-in-the-professional-services

88. A Case Study of Using Metacognitive Reflections to Enhance Writing Skills and Strategies in an Agricultural Media Writing Course - New Prairie Press, accessed April 29, 2025, https://newprairiepress.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1014&context=jac

89. Cognitive Biases and Heuristics | Critical Thinking Class Notes - Fiveable, accessed April 30, 2025, https://fiveable.me/critical-thinking/unit-10

90. Improving Metacognition By Understanding Cognitive Bias, accessed April 30, 2025, https://www.improvewithmetacognition.com/improve-metacognition-by-understanding-cognitive-bias/

91. Reflective Judgment: Theory and Research on the Development of Epistemic Assumptions Through Adulthood - ResearchGate, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247522681_Reflective_Judgment_Theory_and_Research_on_the_Development_of_Epistemic_Assumptions_Through_Adulthood

92. Reflective Judgment: Theory and Research on the Development of Epistemic Assumptions Through Adulthood - University of Iowa Pressbooks, accessed April 29, 2025, https://pressbooks.uiowa.edu/app/uploads/sites/215/2021/06/KingKitchener-Reflective-Judgement.pdf

93. PERSUASIVE DEVELOPMENTS: REFLECTIVE JUDGMENT AND COLLEGE STUDENTS' WRITTEN ARGUMENTATION - NC State Repository, accessed April 29, 2025, https://repository.lib.ncsu.edu/bitstreams/1d5bc76b-ff3c-49f4-bcd9-9a29e346971b/download

94. Reflection and Reasoning in Moral Judgment - ResearchGate, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51767356_Reflection_and_Reasoning_in_Moral_Judgment

95. Creative workspaces and designer metacognition: A framework, measures, and interventions - DRS Digital Library, accessed April 29, 2025, https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3424&context=drs-conference-papers

96. Metacognitive Strategies for Developing Complex Geographical ..., accessed April 30, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8314379/

97. Metacognition And Learning: Strategies For Instructional Design - The eLearning Coach, accessed April 29, 2025, https://theelearningcoach.com/learning/metacognition-and-learning/

98. Metacognitive Reflection - Army University Press, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Portals/7/PDF-UA-docs/Miller-Metacognitive-Reflection-UA.pdf

99. Metacognition and Why it Matters in Education | Getting Smart, accessed April 30, 2025, https://www.gettingsmart.com/2019/10/06/metacognition-and-why-it-matters-in-education/

100. What is metacognitive reflection? The moderating role of metacognition on emotional regulation and reflection - Frontiers, accessed April 30, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/education/articles/10.3389/feduc.2023.1166195/full

101. Metacognitive Reflection: The Framework for Facilitating Reflective ..., accessed April 30, 2025, https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Journal-of-Military-Learning/Journal-of-Military-Learning-Archives/October-2021/Miller-Metacognitive-Reflection/

102. Interview Considerations—Metacognition Deficits - Police Chief Magazine, accessed April 30, 2025, https://www.policechiefmagazine.org/interview-considerations-metacognition-deficits/

103. 8. The Reflection Tree: A Systems Thinking Approach to Exploring a Research Topic, accessed April 29, 2025, https://pressbooks.bccampus.ca/activelearningforrealworldinquiry/chapter/the-reflection-tree-a-systems-thinking-approach-to-exploring-a-research-topic/

104. effectuation.org, accessed April 29, 2025, https://effectuation.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/A-situated-metacognitive-model-of-the-entrepreneurial-mindset-%E2%98%86-%E2%98%86%E2%98%86.pdf

105. Strategic Doing as a Design Discipline, accessed April 29, 2025, https://strategicdoing.net/strategic-doing-as-a-design-discipline/

106. Strategic ambiguity: a systematic review, a typology and a dynamic capability view | Emerald Insight, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/md-05-2024-1021/full/html

107. Strategic ambiguity: a systematic review, a typology and a dynamic capability view, accessed April 29, 2025, https://art.torvergata.it/retrieve/a6e0dea1-4ac4-4021-b64b-ef1905fdc30c/Selivanovskikh%20et%20al.%202025.pdf

108. What Is Design Thinking & Why Is It Important? - HBS Online - Harvard Business School, accessed April 29, 2025, https://online.hbs.edu/blog/post/what-is-design-thinking

109. What is a Design Sprint?, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.designsprint.academy/blog/what-is-a-design-sprint

110. Reflective Design, accessed April 29, 2025, https://nissenbaum.tech.cornell.edu/papers/reflectivedesign.pdf

111. The Dimensions of Thinking, Reflecting, and Knowing through Design Harah Chon Design is defined by complexity, in both its pract, accessed April 29, 2025, https://ualresearchonline.arts.ac.uk/id/eprint/18951/4/The%20Dimensions%20of%20Thinking_v2.pdf

112. osf.io, accessed April 30, 2025, https://osf.io/hwrvc/download/

113. Reflective practice in context: Art and Design – Key Transferable Skills - RMIT Open Press, accessed April 29, 2025, https://rmit.pressbooks.pub/keytransferableskills/chapter/reflective-practice-in-context-design/

114. Metacognition – Cultivating Reflection to Help Students Become Self-Directed Learners - College of LSA, accessed April 30, 2025, https://lsa.umich.edu/content/dam/sweetland-assets/sweetland-documents/teachingresources/CultivatingReflectionandMetacognition/Metacognition.pdf

115. Does reflective thinking also include meta cognitive thinking if it is interwoven between thinking critically and creatively? | ResearchGate, accessed April 30, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/post/Does-reflective-thinking-also-include-meta-cognitive-thinking-if-it-is-interwoven-between-thinking-critically-and-creatively

116. Metacognition and Self-regulated Learning | EEF, accessed April 30, 2025, https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/education-evidence/guidance-reports/metacognition

117. METACOGNITION AND THE REFLECTIVE WRITING PRACTITIONER: AN INTEGRATED KNOWLEDGE APPROACH - The WAC Clearinghouse, accessed April 30, 2025, https://wac.colostate.edu/docs/books/cognition/chapter11.pdf

118. Reflective Design Thinking | Minu Kumar - SF State Faculty Sites, accessed April 29, 2025, https://faculty.sfsu.edu/~mkumar/content/reflective-design-thinking-0

119. REFLECTIVE PRACTICE IN LEGAL EDUCATION: THE STAGES OF REFLECTION - NYU Law, accessed April 29, 2025, http://www.law.nyu.edu/sites/default/files/upload_documents/Timothy%20Casey%20-%20Stages%20of%20Reflection.pdf

120. Key Systems Thinking Techniques for Public Policy Implementation - Number Analytics, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/systems-thinking-techniques-public-policy-implementation

121. The Ultimate Guide to Systems Thinking in Public Policy, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/ultimate-systems-thinking-public-policy-guide

122. Systems Thinking Based Change Management: An In-depth Exploration - rudyct.com, accessed April 29, 2025, https://rudyct.com/ab/System.Thinking-on.Change.pdf

123. Unlocking the Power of Systems Thinking and Organizational Learning, accessed April 29, 2025, https://instituteod.com/unlocking-the-power-of-systems-thinking-and-organizational-learning/

124. Systems Thinking For Organizational Change - Amazon.com, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.amazon.com/Systems-Thinking-Organizational-Change-Publishing/dp/B0DB7K6JF4

125. Strategic Design: The integration of the two fields of Strategy and Design - DRS Digital Library, accessed April 29, 2025, https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3521&context=drs-conference-papers

126. (PDF) Design for Complexity - ResearchGate, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377057581_Design_for_Complexity

127. (PDF) Strategic Design: The integration of the two fields of Strategy and Design, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379723642_Strategic_Design_The_integration_of_the_two_fields_of_Strategy_and_Design

128. An introduction to designing for complexity - IxDA Oslo, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.ixda.no/talks/an-introduction-to-designing-for-complexity

129. Creative metacognition in design thinking: exploring theories, educational practices, and their implications for measurement - ResearchGate, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370690596_Creative_metacognition_in_design_thinking_exploring_theories_educational_practices_and_their_implications_for_measurement

130. The Power of Human-Centered Design: Why Empathy Is a Must for Organizational Change Management - College of Continuing and Professional Studies, accessed April 29, 2025, https://ccaps.umn.edu/story/power-human-centered-design-why-empathy-must-organizational-change-management

131. Design / Thinking Strategies - Research Guides at University of British Columbia, accessed April 29, 2025, https://guides.library.ubc.ca/designthinking/strategies

132. Creative metacognition in design thinking: exploring theories, educational practices, and their implications for measurement - Frontiers, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1157001/full

133. On Strategic Design - Educational Designer, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.educationaldesigner.org/ed/volume1/issue3/article9/

134. What Is System Thinking in Health Care? Strategies for Educators to Encourage Holistic Thinking - JBLearning, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.jblearning.com/blog/jbl/2024/01/03/health-systems-thinking

135. IMPARTING DESIGN METHODS WITH THE STRATEGIES OF EXPERTS, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.designsociety.org/download-publication/25467/Imparting+Design+Methods+With+the+Strategies+of+Experts

136. The Role of Metacognitive Components in Creative Thinking - Frontiers, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02404/full

137. Full article: Getting strategic about strategic planning research - Taylor & Francis Online, accessed April 29, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14719037.2017.1285111